blivet 2.0

03/31/2006

Hal, the Central Park Coyote, Dies

Filed under: Environment, Nature — Hal @ 4:23 pm

I think there is a fine line between ‘he died in captivity’ and ‘we didn’t know what we were doing and killed him.’

Hal, the Central Park Coyote, Dies [Yahoo! News/AP]
Hal, the coyote who paid a visit to New York City and was captured as he loped around Central Park, died as he was being tagged for release in the wild, a state official said Friday.

The coyote stopped breathing Thursday night during the routine tagging procedure and biologists could not revive him, said Gabrielle DeMarco, spokeswoman for the state Department of Environmental Conservation.

Pathologists were trying to determine whether the stress of his capture or captivity or something else contributed to the death of the year-old, 35-pound coyote.

I know several biologists who do this routinely and I’ve never heard of them losing a coyote during tagging.

[I had to delete a couple 'what I really thought' sentences above.]

Happy 6, Craig!

Filed under: Friends, Personal — Hal @ 2:27 pm

BookNotes rounds that ‘6′ corner in the midst of migrations to MoveableType. If his URI changes, I’ll post it here.

Craig, we’ll see you at the other end…

(Thanks to Garret for the reminder)

How Many Archaeologists Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb?

Filed under: Archaeology, Humor, Personal — Hal @ 1:42 pm

I found this over at A Christian Think Tank under “Comic Relief — for the pathologically philosophical.” There are some in jokes that might not be immediately obvious to some. Others are painfully obvious (and true).

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
Generally only one, but some rooms we can’t even get into since 1933.

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
Are you kidding?! Why would we let them do that?! The broken bulb is a national treasure, pointing to our rich, rich history and culture. No, we would rather build a shrine there, and charge admission to see the ‘ancient luminosity device’…hmmm, maybe we could even sell little figurines…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
Actually they are afraid to do it…they think that if they remove the top layer bulb, that they will disturb the (presumed) earlier bulbs that are screwed in beneath the one that is currently showing…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
Only one, but it will take years and years of initial site study…we have to first correlate all the surrounding furniture and domestic devices, and then decide whether the anthropological theory about the bulb being a cultic object (based on its central location in the room, its being up out of reach–symbolizing transcendence, and its obviously sun-like shape) is a correct socio-economic understanding…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
All of them. One to change the bulb, and the rest of them to weep about what Thiering, Allegro, Baigent and Leigh will write about it…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
No amount of them can do it, but for an underground antiquities dealer it only takes 5 minutes…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
501–one to take the old bulb out, and 500 to proclaim that it confirms the biblical record…

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
501–one to take the old bulb out, and 500 to proclaim that it dis-confirms the biblical record…(so much for the univocity of the archaeological record, eh?)

How many archaeologists does it take to change a light bulb?
Well, actually, it only takes a couple to remove the old bulb, but then they get so involved in studying the old bulb (especially in trying to correlate its appearance with all other burned-out bulbs within a 1000 km radius), that they never get around to putting the new bulb in… [Comic Relief]

03/30/2006

links for 2006-03-30

Filed under: General — Hal @ 12:18 am
  • “Terragen™ is capable of photorealistic results for professional landscape visualisation, special effects, art and recreation.” reminder for self

03/29/2006

Embarrassed for Our Species

Filed under: Books, Personal, Politics, Popular Culture, Religion, Science — Hal @ 10:09 am

Despite a 25-year residental absence[*], I still think of Kansas as home. I follow some blogs like Pat Hayes at Red State Rabble and Josh Rosenau at Thoughts from Kansas just to try and retain a feel for what is going on in the land of my sires. It comes as no secret to regular readers (thanks, all five of you!) that I would ‘fail to support’ the direction that Christian Fundamentalists on the Kansas State School Board wish to take the state.

That’s ‘fail to support’ as in, ‘no expletive way.’

But, I digress. What I mean to highlight here is Crews’ latest book, Follies of the Wise: Dissenting Essays. Frederick Crews sounds like my kind of guy.

Embarrassed for His Species
When skeptic Frederick Crews, the now retired chair of the UC Berkeley English Department, broke with psychoanalysis, “he set out to study various public enthusiasms, from the recovered memory craze, Rorschach tests, and belief in alien abductions to theosophy and ‘intelligent design’ creationism” reports Jake Fuchs in the Berkeley Daily Planet.

Crews’ latest book, Follies of the Wise: Dissenting Essays, will be published next week by Shoemaker & Hoard.

“Many of my fellow skeptics are Utopians who look forward to a heaven-on-earth from which all illusions have been banished,” says Crews. “My hunch, on the contrary, is that we’re heading into a world of economic and demographic dislocations, strife over dwindling natural resources, increased superstition and sectarian conflict, and vulnerability to horrendous catastrophes, some of which will be our own fault. I’m embarrassed for my species, which has made a great mess but can’t seem to take responsibility for the enormous destruction that’s already well under way. But while I’m still here, I’d like to continue to speak up for values that I regard as universally human and ‘planetary.’”

Red State Rabble has been a long-time fan of Crews’ writing which we’ve followed in the New York Review of Books for many years. Crew’s is an example of how squishy humanities types can — and we think, must — work with scientists to oppose superstition. [Red State Rabble]

* That’s interesting… Come November, I will have ‘not lived in Kansas’ longer than I ‘lived in Kansas.’

links for 2006-03-29

Filed under: General — Hal @ 12:19 am

03/28/2006

Live Eclipse Video

Filed under: Astronomy, Friends, Nature, Science, Space — Hal @ 11:01 pm

Garret has the skinny on getting a look at tomorrow’s total eclipse:

Reuters will have live eclipse video during peak times tomorrow morning (get up early)

links for 2006-03-28

Filed under: General — Hal @ 12:20 am

03/27/2006

Family Oral History Using Digital Tools

Filed under: Anthropology, Family, Friends, History, Personal, Weblogs — Hal @ 8:59 pm

I’m very late in noting that:

[Susan is] very pleased to announce Family Oral History Using Digital Tools, a site devoted to family stories– recording them, transferring them to your computer, and creating digital archive disks. How-tos, tools, techniques. [more at 2020 Hindsight]

Susan has been hard at work and it shows. Family Oral History is fully buzzword-compliant with feeds, a blog and a podcast.
Perhaps it is only because I have achieved a certain minimum location on the chronological X-axis of my life to appreciate such efforts. Well worth a look (and a listen). This is a much needed resource and we are grateful, Susan.

links for 2006-03-27

Filed under: General — Hal @ 12:20 am

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress
copyright © Hal B. Rager 1999-2010, except when held by others