My inital impressions from the ‘blogs I frequent - which of course support many if not most of my biases - fall along a couple of lines of thought. One is that I’m surrounded by geniuses
(but you knew that about yourselves). The other is actually two that seem linked in my brain. I am reminded of the Chinese curse, May you live in interesting times, which these certainly are. The other is an abiding affection for Carl Sagan, whose parting gift to us was a book titled Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark which seems as a candle all its own. That’s pretty close to the title anyway, I’m too rooted in this chair to walk out to the living room and look. The next time I get up I plan a one-way to that good friend of mine, bed-san. Anyway, it would seem a great darkness is issuing from the halls of governence (is that a word?) and I fear it will get darker than I hope. This is juxtaposed with the onset of Spring and the near-universal motif of rebirth and renewal which Dan reminded me of as I drifted towards the shoals of pessimism that can only come from acute fatigue. Thanks Dan. Now I must go. Be well. Apologies for the mispellings.
Al and garret - I hope both of you get to feeling better.
LInks to follow, though I’m trying to stay away from politics. We’ll see.
Slight apologies for the length of this one.
Our presentation that Greg will give on Burnt Rock Mound at the national conference got sent to the film printer late today. I’m beat. I can retrench now and finish the lithic analysis and see if its possible to parse the archaeology on a finer scale. Off the cuff summary - we shifted the onset of the Jet Stream moving back north to around 15,500 years ago (calibrated date). That pushes the beginning of the end of the glaciation back 1,500 years which implies a longer ‘wet’ period in the northern Mojave - southern Great Basin. Also, solid support from several lines of evidence for the abrupt onset of the very dry period here from about 9,000 to 7,500 years ago. Along with that we have very xeric (formed in extreme dryness) buried soil profiles truncated by an (apparently) wind-eroded unconformity in the soil profile. The aquifers recharge about 6,600 years ago with an episode of spring activity that correlates very well throughout the region with continental analogs like the vegetation changes in the Great Plains, northern Mexico, coastal California, and eastern forests. From an archaeological point of view, there is no sign of a human presence until 4,500 years ago, which is consistent with the region. What we have that is fairly unique is a suite of 23 radiocarbon dates that are completely internally consistent from in-situ materials that are either ‘black mat’ (organic spring deposits) or charcoal from the excavation units. There’s no ‘fliers’ or data that has to be explained away. The whole thing holds together without having to issue caveats. In our combined 46 years of doing this archaeology thing we’ve never been involved in a project where we were able to do that. That was what I was trying to poke holes in earlier this week. Greg gave me one of the highest compliments an archaeologist gives another when he was looking over the results I put together on Wednesday. He just grinned. “You’re pretty good. I’d let you dig one of my sites.” It wasn’t (and isn’t) an especially euphoric moment, though it was pleasurable coming from a long-stand friend who will be completely honest with you. My reaction was more of a ‘thanks, it is a pretty good piece of work’. By this point, there’s no ego left in it, it just gets wrung out over the months of analysis and writing and 14 hour days.
That probably would have sounded arrogant to me 15 years ago. But, after a while, you know what’s good and what isn’t, even if it’s something you’ve produced. Once it passes that harshest of critics (yourself), it just confirms your judgement of other people when they see it too. The situtation becoems ripe for understatement. Or maybe it’s just my Midwestern upbringing. You’ve done things very well too, I bet you know the feeling.
In other work news, today was the last day on the project for our biologist, a woman I’ve known for six years. One of the most upbeat people I’ve ever known, she gives light to all in her vicinity. She is returning to school to pursue a second career in nursing, likely in Neo-Natal Intensive Care. Anyway, that’s what I think that’s what ‘Nic-Yoo’ (NICU?) stands for. I parsed it that way, but never thought to ask her. She will be an asset wherever she ends up. I would hire her in a second if I was a hiring type person.
Hi. I’m still here.